From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.38.185]) by mtagate5.uk.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kALCKEhi149132 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:20:14 GMT Received: from d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.228]) by d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/NCO v8.1.1) with ESMTP id kALCN4xv2527370 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:23:05 GMT Received: from d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id kALCKDhX031548 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:20:13 GMT Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:19:03 +0100 From: Heiko Carstens Subject: Re: [RFC] virtual memmap for sparsemem [1/2] arch independent part Message-ID: <20061121121903.GC8122@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> References: <20061019172140.5a29962c.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20061121113708.GB8122@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> <20061121211937.e25dceb8.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061121211937.e25dceb8.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com List-ID: > > I'd love to go for a generic implementation, but if that is based on > > sparsemem it doesn't make too much sense on s390. > > 'What type of vmem_map is supported ?' is maybe per-arch decision not generic. > If people dislikes Flat/Discontig/Sparsemem complication, some clean > up patch will be posted and discussion will start. If not, nothing will happen. Ok, I will work on the s390 arch specific patch and post it here. Maybe it's worth adding a generic vmem_map interface, maybe not. We'll see. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org