From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: call into direct reclaim without PF_MEMALLOC set
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 13:32:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061115133216.3a45a176.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1163625815.5968.66.camel@twins>
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 22:23:35 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> (Sorry about the dup Andrew, I noticed I hit the wrong reply button)
>
> OK, so how about this?
>
> No use running direct reclaim if we're already in there.
>
> ---
>
> PF_MEMALLOC is also used to prevent recursion of direct reclaim.
> However this invocation does not set PF_MEMALLOC nor checks it and
> hence a can make it nest a single time. Either by reaching this
> spot from reclaim and then calling it again or entering here and
> encountering a __GFP_WAIT alloc from within.
>
> So check for PF_MEMALLOC and avoid a second invocation and otherwise
> set PF_MEMALLOC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> ---
> fs/buffer.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6-git/fs/buffer.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-git.orig/fs/buffer.c 2006-11-15 20:32:14.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6-git/fs/buffer.c 2006-11-15 21:52:05.000000000 +0100
> @@ -360,8 +360,18 @@ static void free_more_memory(void)
>
> for_each_online_pgdat(pgdat) {
> zones = pgdat->node_zonelists[gfp_zone(GFP_NOFS)].zones;
> - if (*zones)
> + if (*zones && !(current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC)) {
> + struct task_struct *p = current;
> + struct reclaim_state reclaim_state = { 0 };
> +
> + p->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC;
> + p->reclaim_state = &reclaim_state;
> +
> try_to_free_pages(zones, GFP_NOFS);
> +
> + p->reclaim_state = NULL;
> + p->flags &= ~PF_MEMALLOC;
> + }
> }
> }
>
spose so. It assume that current->reclaim_state is NULL if !PF_MEMALLOC
which I guess is true.
But do we need to set current->reclaim_state at all in here?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-15 21:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-15 19:25 Peter Zijlstra
2006-11-15 20:42 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-15 21:23 ` [PATCH] " Peter Zijlstra
2006-11-15 21:32 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
[not found] ` <1163625058.5968.64.camel@twins>
[not found] ` <20061115132340.3cbf4008.akpm@osdl.org>
2006-11-15 21:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-11-15 22:00 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-15 22:12 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-11-15 22:24 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-16 9:52 ` [PATCH] mm: cleanup and document reclaim recursion Peter Zijlstra
2006-11-17 0:16 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-17 8:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-11-17 12:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061115133216.3a45a176.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox