From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org,
"Benzi Galili (Benzi@ScaleMP.com)" <benzi@scalemp.com>,
"Shai Fultheim (Shai@scalex86.org)" <shai@scalex86.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] add dev_to_node()
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 22:25:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061107062536.GA3729@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061104235323.GA1353@lst.de>
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 12:53:23AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 06:06:48PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 11:56:29PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >
> > This will break the compile for !NUMA if someone ends up doing a bisect
> > and lands here as a bisect point.
> >
> > You introduce this nice wrapper..
>
> The dev_to_node wrapper is not enough as we can't assign to (-1) for
> the non-NUMA case. So I added a second macro, set_dev_node for that.
>
> The patch below compiles and works on numa and non-NUMA platforms.
>
>
Hi Christoph,
dev_to_node does not work as expected on x86_64 (and i386). This is because
node value returned by pcibus_to_node is initialized after a struct device
is created with current x86_64 code.
We need the node value initialized before the call to pci_scan_bus_parented,
as the generic devices are allocated and initialized
off pci_scan_child_bus, which gets called from pci_scan_bus_parented
The following patch does that using "pci_sysdata" introduced by the PCI
domain patches in -mm.
Signed-off-by: Alok N Kataria <alok.kataria@calsoftinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Ravikiran Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>
Signed-off-by: Shai Fultheim <shai@scalex86.org>
Index: linux-2.6.19-rc4mm2/arch/i386/pci/acpi.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.19-rc4mm2.orig/arch/i386/pci/acpi.c 2006-11-06 11:03:50.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc4mm2/arch/i386/pci/acpi.c 2006-11-06 22:04:14.000000000 -0800
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ struct pci_bus * __devinit pci_acpi_scan
{
struct pci_bus *bus;
struct pci_sysdata *sd;
+ int pxm;
/* Allocate per-root-bus (not per bus) arch-specific data.
* TODO: leak; this memory is never freed.
@@ -30,15 +31,21 @@ struct pci_bus * __devinit pci_acpi_scan
}
#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS */
+ sd->node = -1;
+
+ pxm = acpi_get_pxm(device->handle);
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
+ if (pxm >= 0)
+ sd->node = pxm_to_node(pxm);
+#endif
+
bus = pci_scan_bus_parented(NULL, busnum, &pci_root_ops, sd);
if (!bus)
kfree(sd);
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
if (bus != NULL) {
- int pxm = acpi_get_pxm(device->handle);
if (pxm >= 0) {
- sd->node = pxm_to_node(pxm);
printk("bus %d -> pxm %d -> node %d\n",
busnum, pxm, sd->node);
}
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-07 6:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-30 14:15 Christoph Hellwig
2006-10-30 22:33 ` David Miller, Christoph Hellwig
2006-11-01 0:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-01 0:53 ` David Miller, Christoph Lameter
2006-11-01 1:58 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-04 22:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-11-04 23:06 ` Dave Jones
2006-11-04 23:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-11-04 23:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-11-05 8:22 ` David Miller, Christoph Hellwig
2006-11-06 23:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-11-07 6:25 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai [this message]
2006-11-07 10:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-11-08 2:40 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2006-11-10 18:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-10 18:28 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2006-11-11 0:08 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061107062536.GA3729@localhost.localdomain \
--to=kiran@scalex86.org \
--cc=benzi@scalemp.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shai@scalex86.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox