From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@skynet.ie>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: Page allocator: Single Zone optimizations
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 12:34:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061101123451.3fd6cfa4.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061101182605.GC27386@skynet.ie>
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006 18:26:05 +0000
mel@skynet.ie (Mel Gorman) wrote:
> I never really got this objection. With list-based anti-frag, the
> zone-balancing logic remains the same. There are patches from Andy
> Whitcroft that reclaims pages in contiguous blocks, but still with the same
> zone-ordering. It doesn't affect load balancing between zones as such.
I do believe that lumpy-reclaim (initiated by Andy, redone and prototyped
by Peter, cruelly abandoned) is a perferable approach to solving the
fragmentation approach.
And with __GFP_EASYRECLAIM (please - I just renamed it ;)) (or using
__GFP_HIGHMEM for the same thing) then some of the core lumpy-reclaim
algorithm can be reused for hot-unplug.
If you want to unplug a range of memory then it has to be in a zone which
is 100% __GFP_EASY_RECLAIM (actually the name is still wrong. It should
just be __GFP_RECLAIMABLE).
The hot-unplug code will go through those pages and it will, with 100%
reliability, rip those pages out of the kernel via various means. I think
this can all be done.
And hot-unplug isn't actually the interesting application. Modern Intel
memory controllers apparently have (or will have) the ability to power down
DIMMs.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-01 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-17 0:50 Christoph Lameter
2006-10-17 1:10 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-17 1:13 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-17 1:27 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2006-10-17 1:25 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-17 6:04 ` Nick Piggin
2006-10-17 17:54 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-18 11:15 ` Nick Piggin
2006-10-18 19:38 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-23 23:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-24 1:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-26 22:09 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-26 22:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-28 1:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-28 2:04 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-28 2:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-28 2:24 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-28 2:31 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-28 4:43 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-28 7:47 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2006-10-28 16:12 ` Andi Kleen
2006-10-29 0:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-29 1:04 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-29 1:29 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-29 11:32 ` Nick Piggin
2006-10-30 16:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-01 18:26 ` Mel Gorman
2006-11-01 20:34 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-11-01 21:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-01 21:46 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-01 21:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-01 22:13 ` Mel Gorman
2006-11-01 23:29 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-02 0:22 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-02 0:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-02 12:45 ` Mel Gorman
2006-11-01 22:10 ` Mel Gorman
2006-11-02 17:37 ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-11-02 18:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-02 20:58 ` Mel Gorman
2006-11-02 21:04 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-02 21:16 ` Mel Gorman
2006-11-02 21:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-02 22:37 ` Mel Gorman
2006-11-02 22:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-03 9:14 ` Mel Gorman
2006-11-03 13:17 ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-11-03 18:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-03 19:06 ` Mel Gorman
2006-11-03 19:44 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-03 21:11 ` Mel Gorman
2006-11-03 21:42 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-03 21:50 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-03 21:53 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-03 22:12 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-03 22:15 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-03 22:19 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-04 0:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-04 1:32 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-06 16:40 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-06 16:56 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-06 17:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-06 17:07 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-06 17:12 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-11-06 17:15 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-06 17:20 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-06 17:26 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-07 16:30 ` Mel Gorman
2006-11-07 17:54 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-07 18:14 ` Mel Gorman
2006-11-08 0:29 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2006-11-08 2:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-13 21:08 ` Mel Gorman
2006-11-03 12:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-11-03 18:15 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-03 18:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-11-03 19:23 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-02 18:52 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-02 21:51 ` Mel Gorman
2006-11-02 22:03 ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-11-02 22:11 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-01 18:13 ` Mel Gorman
2006-11-01 17:39 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061101123451.3fd6cfa4.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@skynet.ie \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox