From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 15:52:11 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3]: leak tracking for kmalloc node Message-ID: <20061030145211.GA9238@lst.de> References: <20061030141454.GB7164@lst.de> <84144f020610300632i799214a6p255e1690a93a95d4@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <84144f020610300632i799214a6p255e1690a93a95d4@mail.gmail.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Pekka Enberg Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 04:32:57PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote: > On 10/30/06, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > >If we want to use the node-aware kmalloc in __alloc_skb we need > >the tracker is responsible for leak tracking magic for it. This > >patch implements it. The code is far too ugly for my taste, but it's > >doing exactly what the regular kmalloc is doing and thus follows it's > >style. > > Yeah, the allocation paths are ugly. If only someone with NUMA machine > could give this a shot so we can get it merged: > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=115952740803511&w=2 > > Should clean up NUMA kmalloc tracking too. I'll give this a try on a small numa machine (CELL with 2 nodes). -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org