linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: hch@lst.de
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] add dev_to_node()
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:33:57 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 15:15:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061030.143357.130208425.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061030141501.GC7164@lst.de>

> Davem suggested to get the node-affinity information directly from
> struct device instead of having the caller extreact it from the
> pci_dev.  This patch adds dev_to_node() to the topology API for that.
> The implementation is rather ugly as we need to compare the bus
> operations which we can't do inline in a header without pulling all
> kinds of mess in.
> 
> Thus provide an out of line dev_to_node for ppc and let everyone else
> use the dummy variant in asm-generic.h for now.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

It may be a bit much to be calling all the way through up to the PCI
layer just to pluck out a simple integer, don't you think?  The PCI
bus pointer comparison is just a symptom of how silly this is.

Especially since this will be used for every packet allocation a
device makes.

So, please add some sanity to this situation and just put the node
into the generic struct device. :-)

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2006-10-30 22:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-30 14:15 Christoph Hellwig
2006-10-30 22:33 ` David Miller, Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2006-11-01  0:10   ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-01  0:53     ` David Miller, Christoph Lameter
2006-11-01  1:58       ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-04 22:56   ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-11-04 23:06     ` Dave Jones
2006-11-04 23:09       ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-11-04 23:53       ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-11-05  8:22         ` David Miller, Christoph Hellwig
2006-11-06 23:39           ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-11-07  6:25         ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-11-07 10:15           ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-11-08  2:40     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2006-11-10 18:16       ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-10 18:28         ` Lee Schermerhorn
2006-11-11  0:08           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061030.143357.130208425.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox