From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 16:56:43 +0200 From: Nick Piggin Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] mm: add arch_alloc_page Message-ID: <20061011145643.GA5259@wotan.suse.de> References: <20061007105758.14024.70048.sendpatchset@linux.site> <20061007105824.14024.85405.sendpatchset@linux.site> <20061007134345.0fa1d250.akpm@osdl.org> <452856E4.60705@yahoo.com.au> <1160578104.634.2.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1160578104.634.2.camel@localhost> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Martin Schwidefsky Cc: Nick Piggin , Andrew Morton , Linux Memory Management , Linux Kernel List-ID: On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 04:48:24PM +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 11:39 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > > >On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 15:06:04 +0200 (CEST) > > >Nick Piggin wrote: > > > > > > > > >>Add an arch_alloc_page to match arch_free_page. > > >> > > > > > >umm.. why? > > > > > > > I had a future patch to more kernel_map_pages into it, but couldn't > > decide if that's a generic kernel feature that is only implemented in > > 2 architectures, or an architecture speicifc feature. So I left it out. > > > > But at least Martin wanted a hook here for his volatile pages patches, > > so I thought I'd submit this patch anyway. > > With Nicks patch I can use arch_alloc_page instead of page_set_stable, > but I can still not use arch_free_page instead of page_set_unused > because it is done before the check for reserved pages. If reserved > pages go away or the arch_free_page call would get moved after the check > I could replace page_set_unused as well. So with Nicks patch we are only > halfway there.. Ahh, but with my patchSET I think we are all the way there ;) Nick -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org