Re: [PATCH] page_alloc: fix kernel-doc and func. declaration

[Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>]

On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 14:36:58 -0700 (PDT) Christoph Lameter wrote:

> On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> 
> >  /**
> >   * set_dma_reserve - Account the specified number of pages reserved in ZONE_DMA
> > - * @new_dma_reserve - The number of pages to mark reserved
> > + * @new_dma_reserve: The number of pages to mark reserved
> >   *
> >   * The per-cpu batchsize and zone watermarks are determined by present_pages.
> >   * In the DMA zone, a significant percentage may be consumed by kernel image
> >   * and other unfreeable allocations which can skew the watermarks badly. This
> >   * function may optionally be used to account for unfreeable pages in
> > - * ZONE_DMA. The effect will be lower watermarks and smaller per-cpu batchsize
> > + * ZONE_DMA. The effect will be lower watermarks and smaller per-cpu batchsize.
> >   */
> >  void __init set_dma_reserve(unsigned long new_dma_reserve)
> 
> Hmmm. With the optional ZONE_DMA patch this becomes a reservation in the 
> first zone, which may be ZONE_NORMAL.

I didn't change any of that wording.  Do you want to change it?
do you want me to make that change?  or what?

thanks,
---
~Randy

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>