From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@cs.washington.edu>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@osdl.org, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au,
ak@suse.de, mbligh@google.com, rohitseth@google.com,
menage@google.com, clameter@sgi.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] another way to speed up fake numa node page_alloc
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 23:48:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061001234858.fe91109e.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0610012330110.10476@attu4.cs.washington.edu>
David wrote:
> It would be nice to be able to scale this so that the speed-up works
> efficiently for numa=fake=256 (after NODES_SHIFT is increased from 6 to 8
> on x86_64).
I'm not sure what you have in mind by "scale this."
We have a linear search of zones ... my speedup just changes the
constant multiplier, by converting that search from one that takes
one or two cache lines per node, to one that takes an unsigned
short, from compact array, per node.
This speedup should apply regardless of how many nodes (fake or
real or mixed) are present.
The fake node case is more interesting, because the usage pattern
it anticipates, with many, even most, of a long string of nodes
full during ordinary operation, stresses this linear scan more.
But whatever benefit this proposal has should be independent of the
value of NODES_SHIFT.
The systems I care most about, ia64 sn2, are already running with a
default NODES_SHIFT of 10.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-02 6:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-25 9:14 Paul Jackson
2006-09-26 6:08 ` David Rientjes
2006-09-26 7:06 ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-26 18:17 ` David Rientjes
2006-09-26 19:24 ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-26 19:58 ` David Rientjes
2006-09-26 21:48 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-02 6:18 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-02 6:31 ` David Rientjes
2006-10-02 6:48 ` Paul Jackson [this message]
2006-10-02 7:05 ` David Rientjes
2006-10-02 8:41 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-03 18:15 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-03 19:37 ` David Rientjes
2006-10-04 15:45 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-04 16:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-04 22:10 ` David Rientjes
2006-10-05 2:27 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-05 2:37 ` David Rientjes
2006-10-05 2:53 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-05 3:00 ` David Rientjes
2006-10-05 3:26 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-05 3:49 ` David Rientjes
2006-10-05 4:07 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-05 4:14 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-05 4:50 ` David Rientjes
2006-10-05 4:53 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-11 3:42 ` Paul Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061001234858.fe91109e.pj@sgi.com \
--to=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mbligh@google.com \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=rientjes@cs.washington.edu \
--cc=rohitseth@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox