linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesse Barnes <jesse.barnes@intel.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Martin Bligh <mbligh@mbligh.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	akpm@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Initial alpha-0 for new page allocator API
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 13:41:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200609221341.44354.jesse.barnes@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0609221321280.9181@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>

On Friday, September 22, 2006 1:23 pm, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Here is an iniitial patch of alloc_pages_range (untested, compiles).
> Directed reclaim missing. Feedback wanted. There are some comments in
> the patch where I am at the boundary of my knowledge and it would be
> good if someone could supply the info needed.
>
> Index: linux-2.6.18-rc7-mm1/arch/i386/kernel/pci-dma.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.18-rc7-mm1.orig/arch/i386/kernel/pci-dma.c	2006-09-22
> 15:10:42.246731179 -0500 +++
> linux-2.6.18-rc7-mm1/arch/i386/kernel/pci-dma.c	2006-09-22
> 15:11:10.449709078 -0500 @@ -26,6 +26,8 @@ void
> *dma_alloc_coherent(struct device *
>  			   dma_addr_t *dma_handle, gfp_t gfp)
>  {
>  	void *ret;
> +	unsigned long low = 0L;
> +	unsigned long high = 0xffffffff;
>  	struct dma_coherent_mem *mem = dev ? dev->dma_mem : NULL;
>  	int order = get_order(size);
>  	/* ignore region specifiers */
> @@ -44,10 +46,14 @@ void *dma_alloc_coherent(struct device *
>  			return NULL;
>  	}
>
> -	if (dev == NULL || (dev->coherent_dma_mask < 0xffffffff))
> -		gfp |= GFP_DMA;
> +	if (dev == NULL)
> +		/* Apply safe ISA LIMITS */
> +		high = 16*1024*1024L;
> +	else
> +	if (dev->coherent_dma_mask < 0xffffffff)
> +		high = dev->coherent_dma_mask;

With your alloc_pages_range this check can go away.  I think only the dev 
== NULL check is needed with this scheme since it looks like there's no 
way (currently) for ISA devices to store their masks for later 
consultation by arch code? 

> +	/*
> +	 * Is there an upper/lower limit of installed memory that we could
> +	 * check against instead of -1 ? The less memory installed the less
> +	 * the chance that we would have to do the expensive range search.
> +	 */
> +	if (high == -1L && low == 0L)
> +		return alloc_pages(gfp_flags, order);

There's max_pfn, but on machines with large memory holes using it might not 
help much.

Jesse

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2006-09-22 20:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-22  4:02 Christoph Lameter
2006-09-22  6:17 ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-22 16:35   ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-22 19:10     ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-22 19:17       ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-22 19:24       ` Martin Bligh
2006-09-22 20:10       ` Alan Cox
2006-09-22 20:02         ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-22 20:14           ` Martin Bligh
2006-09-22 20:23             ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-22 20:41               ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2006-09-22 21:01                 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-22 21:14                   ` Jesse Barnes
2006-09-22 21:21                     ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-22 20:48               ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-22 21:13                 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-22 21:32                 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-22 23:34               ` More thoughts on getting rid of ZONE_DMA Andi Kleen
2006-09-23  0:23                 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-23  0:39                   ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-23  0:25                 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-23  0:37                   ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-24  2:13                 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-24  2:36                   ` Martin J. Bligh
2006-09-24  7:26                     ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-24  7:19                   ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-22 17:36   ` [RFC] Initial alpha-0 for new page allocator API Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200609221341.44354.jesse.barnes@intel.com \
    --to=jesse.barnes@intel.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@google.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mbligh@mbligh.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox