From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 06:03:58 -0700 From: Paul Jackson Subject: Re: [PATCH] GFP_THISNODE for the slab allocator Message-Id: <20060917060358.ac16babf.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20060914220011.2be9100a.akpm@osdl.org> <20060914234926.9b58fd77.pj@sgi.com> <20060915002325.bffe27d1.akpm@osdl.org> <20060915004402.88d462ff.pj@sgi.com> <20060915010622.0e3539d2.akpm@osdl.org> <20060917041707.28171868.pj@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Christoph Lameter Cc: rientjes@google.com, akpm@osdl.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: Christoph wrote: > Are you sure that you are looking at a current tree? This is zone_to_nid > here. You're two steps ahead of me. Yes, it's zone_to_nid() in the current tree. So ... any idea why your patch made only 0.000042% difference in the cost per call of __cpuset_zone_allowed()? That is bizarrely close to zero. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org