From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
Martin Bligh <mbligh@google.com>, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: -mm numa perf regression
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 09:35:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060911093549.a553cfe5.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45057055.7070003@shadowen.org>
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:19:01 +0100
Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org> wrote:
> Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> >
> >>> I have not heard back from you on this issue. It would be good to have
> >>> some more data on this one.
> >> Sorry I submitted the tests and the results filtered out to TKO, and
> >> then I forgot to check them. Looking at the graph backing this out has
> >> had no effect. As I think we'd expect from what comes below.
> >>
> >> What next?
> >
> > Get me the promised data? /proc/zoneinfo before and after the run.
> > /proc/meminfo and /sys/devices/system/node/node*/* would be helpful.
>
> Sorry for the delay, the relevant files wern't all being preserved.
> Fixed that up and reran things. The results you asked for are available
> here:
>
> http://www.shadowen.org/~apw/public/debug-moe-perf/47138/
>
> Just having a quick look at the results, it seems that they are saying
> that all of our cpu's are in node 0 which isn't right at all. The
> machine has 4 processors per node.
>
> I am sure that would account for the performance loss. Now as to why ...
>
> > Is there a way to remotely access the box?
>
> Sadly no ... I do have direct access to test on the box but am not able
> to export it.
>
> I've also started a bisection looking for it. Though that will be some
> time yet as I've only just dropped the cleaver for the first time.
>
I've added linux-mm. Can we please keep it on-list. I have a vague suspicion
that your bisection will end up pointing at one Mel Gorman. Or someone else.
But whoever it is will end up wondering wtf is going on.
I don't understand what you mean by "all of our cpu's are in node 0"?
http://www.shadowen.org/~apw/public/debug-moe-perf/47138/sys/devices/system/node.after/node0/
and
http://www.shadowen.org/~apw/public/debug-moe-perf/47138/sys/devices/system/node.before/node0/
look the same.. It depends what "before" and "after" mean, I guess...
Do we have full dmesg output for both 2.6.18-rc6-mm1 and 2.6.18-rc6?
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-11 16:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20060901105554.780e9e78.akpm@osdl.org>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0609011125110.19863@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
[not found] ` <44F88236.10803@google.com>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0609011231300.20077@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
[not found] ` <44F8949E.4010308@google.com>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0609011314590.20312@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
[not found] ` <44F8970F.2050004@google.com>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0609011331240.20357@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
[not found] ` <44F8BB87.7050402@shadowen.org>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0609020658290.22978@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0609071116290.16838@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
[not found] ` <45017C95.90502@shadowen.org>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0609081132200.23089@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
[not found] ` <45057055.7070003@shadowen.org>
2006-09-11 16:35 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-09-11 16:41 ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-09-11 17:16 ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-09-11 18:51 ` keith mannthey
2006-09-11 21:36 ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-09-11 21:33 ` Andy Whitcroft
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060911093549.a553cfe5.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mbligh@google.com \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox