Re: [patch 1/2] own header file for struct page.

[Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>]

> > This moves the definition of struct page from mm.h to its own header file
> > page.h.
> > This is a prereq to fix SetPageUptodate which is broken on s390:
> > 
> > #define SetPageUptodate(_page)
> >        do {
> >                struct page *__page = (_page);
> >                if (!test_and_set_bit(PG_uptodate, &__page->flags))
> >                        page_test_and_clear_dirty(_page);
> >        } while (0)
> > 
> > _page gets used twice in this macro which can cause subtle bugs. Using
> > __page for the page_test_and_clear_dirty call doesn't work since it
> > causes yet another problem with the page_test_and_clear_dirty macro as
> > well.
> > In order to get of all these problems caused by macros it seems to
> > be a good idea to get rid of them and convert them to static inline
> > functions. Because of header file include order it's necessary to have a
> > seperate header file for the struct page definition.
> > 
> 
> hmm.
> 
> > --- /dev/null	1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
> > +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/page.h	2006-09-08 13:10:23.000000000 +0200
> 
> We have asm/page.h, and one would expect that a <linux/page.h> would be
> related to <asm/page.h> in the usual fashion.  But it isn't.
> 
> Can we think of a different filename? page-struct.h, maybe? pageframe.h?

Yes, of course.

> > +#ifndef CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM
> > +/* The array of struct pages - for discontigmem use pgdat->lmem_map */
> > +extern struct page *mem_map;
> > +#endif
> 
> Am surprised to see this declaration in this file.

Hmm... first I thought I could add the same declaration to asm-s390/pgtable.h.
But then deciced against it, since I would just duplicate code.
Any better idea where to put it?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>