From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: libnuma interleaving oddness Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:32:23 +0200 References: <20060829231545.GY5195@us.ibm.com> <200608300919.13125.ak@suse.de> <20060830072948.GE5195@us.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20060830072948.GE5195@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200608300932.23746.ak@suse.de> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Nishanth Aravamudan Cc: Christoph Lameter , linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, lnxninja@us.ibm.com, agl@us.ibm.com List-ID: On Wednesday 30 August 2006 09:29, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > > Hmm, maybe mlock() policy() is broken. > > I took out the mlock() call, and I get the same results, FWIW. Then it's probably some new problem in hugetlbfs. Does it work with shmfs? The regression test for hugetlbfs is numactl is unfortunately still disabled. I need to enable it at some point for hugetlbfs now that it reached mainline. -Andi -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org