From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 09:34:28 -0700 From: Paul Jackson Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] "challenged" memory controller Message-Id: <20060817093428.8ae4ca70.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <44E447E7.8070502@in.ibm.com> References: <20060815192047.EE4A0960@localhost.localdomain> <20060815150721.21ff961e.pj@sgi.com> <44E447E7.8070502@in.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: balbir@in.ibm.com Cc: dave@sr71.net, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: Balbir wrote: > Would it be possible to protect task->cpuset using rcu_read_lock() Perhaps. It usually takes me a few days of energetic thinking to provide reliable answers to such cpuset locking questions, so offhand I really don't know. Fortunately Dave assures us it doesn't matter. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org