Re: [PATCH 1/1] network memory allocator.

[Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>]

On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 01:32:02PM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 10:10:29AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig (hch@infradead.org) wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 02:05:03AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > > From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
> > > Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 13:00:31 +0400
> > > 
> > > > So I would like to know how to determine which node should be used for
> > > > allocation. Changes of __get_user_pages() to alloc_pages_node() are
> > > > trivial.
> > > 
> > > netdev_alloc_skb() knows the netdevice, and therefore you can
> > > obtain the "struct device;" referenced inside of the netdev,
> > > and therefore you can determine the node using the struct
> > > device.
> > 
> > It's not that easy unfortunately.  I did what you describe above in my
> > first prototype but then found out the hard way that the struct device
> > in the netdevice can be a non-pci one, e.g. for pcmcia.  Im that case
> > the kernel will crash on you becuase you can only get the node infortmation
> > for pci devices.  My current patchkit adds an "int node" member to struct
> > net_device instead.  I can repost the patchkit ontop of -mm (which is
> > the required slab memory leak tracking changes) if anyone cares.
> 
> Can we check device->bus_type or device->driver->bus against
> &pci_bus_type for that?

We could, but I'd rather waste 4 bytes in struct net_device than having
such ugly warts in common code.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>