From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 02:40:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20060816.024008.74744877.davem@davemloft.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] network memory allocator. From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20060816093837.GA11096@infradead.org> References: <20060816091029.GA6375@infradead.org> <20060816093159.GA31882@2ka.mipt.ru> <20060816093837.GA11096@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org From: Christoph Hellwig Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:38:37 +0100 Return-Path: To: hch@infradead.org Cc: johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru, arnd@arndb.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: > We could, but I'd rather waste 4 bytes in struct net_device than > having such ugly warts in common code. Why not instead have struct device store some default node value? The node decision will be sub-optimal on non-pci but it won't crash. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org