From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:31:54 +0400 From: Evgeniy Polyakov Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/9] deadlock prevention core Message-ID: <20060814073154.GB5161@2ka.mipt.ru> References: <44DFA225.1020508@google.com> <20060813.165540.56347790.davem@davemloft.net> <44DFD262.5060106@google.com> <20060813185309.928472f9.akpm@osdl.org> <1155530453.5696.98.camel@twins> <20060813215853.0ed0e973.akpm@osdl.org> <1155531835.5696.103.camel@twins> <20060813222208.7e8583ac.akpm@osdl.org> <1155537940.5696.117.camel@twins> <17632.9097.195772.410011@cse.unsw.edu.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <17632.9097.195772.410011@cse.unsw.edu.au> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Neil Brown Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Andrew Morton , Daniel Phillips , David Miller , riel@redhat.com, tgraf@suug.ch, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Mike Christie List-ID: On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 05:17:29PM +1000, Neil Brown (neilb@suse.de) wrote: > Would it be too much waste to reserve one page for every idle socket? > > Does this have some fatal flaw? Yep, in some cases number of sockets is unlimited, but number of total memory they can eat is limited already as David mentioned by tcp_?mem[]. > NeilBrown -- Evgeniy Polyakov -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org