From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 09:55:31 +0400 From: Evgeniy Polyakov Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD Message-ID: <20060809055530.GE17446@2ka.mipt.ru> References: <20060808193325.1396.58813.sendpatchset@lappy> <20060809054648.GD17446@2ka.mipt.ru> <20060808.225355.78711315.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060808.225355.78711315.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: David Miller Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, phillips@google.com List-ID: On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 10:53:55PM -0700, David Miller (davem@davemloft.net) wrote: > From: Evgeniy Polyakov > Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 09:46:48 +0400 > > > There is another approach for that - do not use slab allocator for > > network dataflow at all. It automatically has all you pros amd if > > implemented correctly can have a lot of additional usefull and > > high-performance features like full zero-copy and total fragmentation > > avoidance. > > Free advertisement for your network tree allocator Evgeniy? :-) He-he, some kind of :) -- Evgeniy Polyakov -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org