From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 16:58:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20060809.165846.107940575.davem@davemloft.net> Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/9] deadlock prevention core From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <1155132440.12225.70.camel@twins> References: <44D976E6.5010106@google.com> <20060809131942.GY14627@postel.suug.ch> <1155132440.12225.70.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 16:07:20 +0200 Return-Path: To: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl Cc: tgraf@suug.ch, phillips@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > Hmm, what does sk_buff::input_dev do? That seems to store the initial > device? You can run grep on the tree just as easily as I can which is what I did to answer this question. It only takes a few seconds of your time to grep the source tree for things like "skb->input_dev", so would you please do that before asking more questions like this? It does store the initial device, but as Thomas tried so hard to explain to you guys these device pointers in the skb are transient and you cannot refer to them outside of packet receive processing. The reason is that there is no refcounting performed on these devices when they are attached to the skb, for performance reasons, and thus the device can be downed, the module for it removed, etc. long before the skb is freed up. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org