linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sonny Rao <sonny@burdell.org>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, anton@samba.org
Subject: Re: Possible bug in do_execve()
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 14:55:08 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060621185508.GA9234@kevlar.burdell.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060621184129.GB16576@sergelap.austin.ibm.com>

On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 01:41:29PM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
<snip>
> > Is the behavior in do_execve() correct?
> 
> Well, I assume the intent is for out_mm: to clean up from mm_alloc(),
> not from 'init_new_context'.  So I think that code is correct.
> This bug appears to be powerpc-specific, so would the following patch
> be reasonable?
> 
> Note it is entirely untested, just to show where i think this should
> be solved.  But I could try compile+boot test tonight.
> 
> thanks,
> -serge
> 
> From: Serge E. Hallyn <hallyn@sergelap.(none)>
> Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 13:37:27 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] powerpc: check for proper mm->context before destroying
> 
> arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context_64.c:destroy_context() can be called
> from __mmput() in do_execve() if init_new_context() failed.  This
> can result in idr_remove() being called for an invalid context.
> 
> So, don't call idr_remove if there is no context.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
> 
> ---
> 
>  arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context_64.c |    3 +++
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> ee74da9d3c122b92541dd6b7670731bd4a033f04
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context_64.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context_64.c
> index 714a84d..552d590 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context_64.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context_64.c
> @@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ again:
>  
>  void destroy_context(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
> +	if (mm->context.id == NO_CONTEXT)
> +		return;
> +
>  	spin_lock(&mmu_context_lock);
>  	idr_remove(&mmu_context_idr, mm->context.id);
>  	spin_unlock(&mmu_context_lock);

Yeah, I proposed a similar patch to Anton, and it would quiet the
warning on powerpc, but that's not the point.  It happens that powerpc
doesn't use 0 as a context id, but that may not be true on another
architecture.  That's really what I'm concerned about.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2006-06-21 18:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-20  2:25 Sonny Rao
2006-06-21 18:41 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2006-06-21 18:55   ` Sonny Rao [this message]
2006-06-21 19:09     ` Serge E. Hallyn
2006-06-21 19:27       ` Sonny Rao
2006-06-21 19:42         ` Serge E. Hallyn
2006-06-21 20:12           ` Sonny Rao
2006-06-22 11:59             ` Serge E. Hallyn
2006-06-22 20:03               ` Sonny Rao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060621185508.GA9234@kevlar.burdell.org \
    --to=sonny@burdell.org \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox