From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: kmannth@us.ibm.com
Cc: lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, prarit@redhat.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, darnok@us.ibm.com, ak@suse.de
Subject: Re: [Lhms-devel] [RFC] patch [1/1] x86_64 numa aware sparsemem add_memory functinality
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 15:06:53 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060621150653.e00c6d76.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1150868581.8518.28.camel@keithlap>
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 22:43:01 -0700
keith mannthey <kmannth@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hello all,
> This patch is an attempt to add a numa ware add_memory functionality
> to x86_64 using CONFIG_SPARSEMEM. The add memory function today just
> grabs the pgdat from node 0 and adds the memory there. On a numa system
> this is functional but not optimal/correct.
>
At first, sorry for confusing.
reserve_hotadd()/memory-hot-add with preallocated mem_map things are
maintained by x86_64 and Andi Kleen (maybe).
So we (lhms people) are not familiar with this.
And yes, mem_map should be allocated from local node.
I'm now preparing "dynamic local mem_map allocation" for lhms's memory hotplug,
which doesn't depend on SRAT.
Regards,
-Kame
> The SRAT can expose future memory locality. This information is
> already tracked by the nodes_add data structure (it keeps the
> memory/node locality information) from the SRAT code. The code in
> srat.c is built around RESERVE_HOTADD. This patch is a little subtle in
> the way it uses the existing code for use with sparsemem. Perhaps
> acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init needs a larger refactor to fit both
> RESERVE_HOTADD and sparsemem.
>
> This patch still hotadd_percent as a flag to the whole srat parsing
> code to disable and contain broken bios. It's functionality is retained
> and an on off switch to sparsemem hot-add. Without changing the safety
> mechanisms build into the current SRAT code I have provided a path for
> the sparsemem hot-add path to get to the nodes_add data for use at
> runtime.
>
> This is a 1st run at the patch, it works with 2.6.17
>
> Signed-off-by: Keith Mannthey <kmannth@us.ibm.com>
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-21 6:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-21 5:43 keith mannthey
2006-06-21 6:06 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2006-06-21 6:25 ` [Lhms-devel] " keith mannthey
2006-06-21 6:37 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2006-06-21 6:31 ` Yasunori Goto
2006-06-23 17:13 ` Dave Hansen
2006-06-23 17:57 ` [Lhms-devel] " keith mannthey
2006-06-24 2:05 ` [RFC] Patch [1/4] x86_64 sparsmem add- save nodes_add data for later keith mannthey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060621150653.e00c6d76.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=darnok@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kmannth@us.ibm.com \
--cc=lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox