linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: akpm@osdl.org
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, haveblue@us.ibm.com, ak@suse.de,
	bob.picco@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, apw@shadowen.org, mingo@elte.hu,
	mbligh@mbligh.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Align the node_mem_map endpoints to a MAX_ORDER boundary
Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 14:43:01 +0100 (IST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060519134301.29021.71137.sendpatchset@skynet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060519134241.29021.84756.sendpatchset@skynet>

From: Bob Picco <bob.picco@hp.com>

Andy added code to buddy allocator which does not require the zone's
endpoints to be aligned to MAX_ORDER. An issue is that the buddy
allocator requires the node_mem_map's endpoints to be MAX_ORDER aligned.
Otherwise __page_find_buddy could compute a buddy not in node_mem_map for
partial MAX_ORDER regions at zone's endpoints. page_is_buddy will detect
that these pages at endpoints are not PG_buddy (they were zeroed out by
bootmem allocator and not part of zone). Of course the negative here is
we could waste a little memory but the positive is eliminating all the
old checks for zone boundary conditions.

SPARSEMEM won't encounter this issue because of MAX_ORDER size constraint
when SPARSEMEM is configured. ia64 VIRTUAL_MEM_MAP doesn't need the
logic either because the holes and endpoints are handled differently.
This leaves checking alloc_remap and other arches which privately allocate
for node_mem_map.


 include/linux/mmzone.h |    1 +
 mm/page_alloc.c        |   14 +++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Signed-off-by: Bob Picco <bob.picco@hp.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>

diff -rup -X /usr/src/patchset-0.5/bin//dontdiff linux-2.6.17-rc4-mm1-clean/include/linux/mmzone.h linux-2.6.17-rc4-mm1-101-bob-node-alignment/include/linux/mmzone.h
--- linux-2.6.17-rc4-mm1-clean/include/linux/mmzone.h	2006-05-18 17:23:55.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.17-rc4-mm1-101-bob-node-alignment/include/linux/mmzone.h	2006-05-18 17:52:13.000000000 +0100
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
 #else
 #define MAX_ORDER CONFIG_FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER
 #endif
+#define MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES (1 << (MAX_ORDER - 1))
 
 struct free_area {
 	struct list_head	free_list;
diff -rup -X /usr/src/patchset-0.5/bin//dontdiff linux-2.6.17-rc4-mm1-clean/mm/page_alloc.c linux-2.6.17-rc4-mm1-101-bob-node-alignment/mm/page_alloc.c
--- linux-2.6.17-rc4-mm1-clean/mm/page_alloc.c	2006-05-18 17:23:55.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.17-rc4-mm1-101-bob-node-alignment/mm/page_alloc.c	2006-05-18 17:58:10.000000000 +0100
@@ -2484,14 +2484,22 @@ static void __init alloc_node_mem_map(st
 #ifdef CONFIG_FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP
 	/* ia64 gets its own node_mem_map, before this, without bootmem */
 	if (!pgdat->node_mem_map) {
-		unsigned long size;
+		unsigned long size, start, end;
 		struct page *map;
 
-		size = (pgdat->node_spanned_pages + 1) * sizeof(struct page);
+		/*
+		 * The zone's endpoints aren't required to be MAX_ORDER
+		 * aligned but the node_mem_map endpoints must be in order
+		 * for the buddy allocator to function correctly.
+		 */
+		start = pgdat->node_start_pfn & ~(MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES - 1);
+		end = pgdat->node_start_pfn + pgdat->node_spanned_pages;
+		end = ALIGN(end, MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES);
+		size =  (end - start) * sizeof(struct page);
 		map = alloc_remap(pgdat->node_id, size);
 		if (!map)
 			map = alloc_bootmem_node(pgdat, size);
-		pgdat->node_mem_map = map;
+		pgdat->node_mem_map = map + (pgdat->node_start_pfn - start);
 	}
 #ifdef CONFIG_FLATMEM
 	/*

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-19 13:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-19 13:42 [PATCH 0/2] Fixes for node alignment and flatmem assumptions Mel Gorman
2006-05-19 13:43 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2006-05-19 20:49   ` [PATCH 1/2] Align the node_mem_map endpoints to a MAX_ORDER boundary Andrew Morton
2006-05-19 23:25     ` Mel Gorman
2006-05-22  8:25     ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-05-22  8:44       ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-19 13:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] FLATMEM relax requirement for memory to start at pfn 0 Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060519134301.29021.71137.sendpatchset@skynet \
    --to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=apw@shadowen.org \
    --cc=bob.picco@hp.com \
    --cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mbligh@mbligh.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox