linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
	Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: [patch 6/9] oom: handle oom_disable exiting
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 09:21:37 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060515210622.30275.83981.sendpatchset@linux.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060515210529.30275.74992.sendpatchset@linux.site>

Having the oomkilladj == OOM_DISABLE check before the releasing check means
that oomkilladj == OOM_DISABLE tasks exiting will not stop the OOM killer.

Moving the test down will give the desired behaviour. Also: it will allow
them to "OOM-kill" themselves if they are exiting. As per the previous patch,
this is required to prevent OOM killer deadlocks (and they don't actually
get killed, because they're already exiting -- they're simply allowed access
to memory reserves).

Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>

Index: linux-2.6/mm/oom_kill.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ linux-2.6/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -202,8 +202,6 @@ static struct task_struct *select_bad_pr
 		/* skip the init task with pid == 1 */
 		if (p->pid == 1)
 			continue;
-		if (p->oomkilladj == OOM_DISABLE)
-			continue;
 
 		/*
 		 * This is in the process of releasing memory so wait for it
@@ -228,6 +226,8 @@ static struct task_struct *select_bad_pr
 			}
 			return ERR_PTR(-1UL);
 		}
+		if (p->oomkilladj == OOM_DISABLE)
+			continue;
 		if (p->flags & PF_SWAPOFF)
 			return p;
 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-07-28  7:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-28  7:20 [patch 0/9] oom: various fixes and improvements for 2.6.18-rc2 Nick Piggin
2006-07-28  7:20 ` [patch 1/9] oom: use unreclaimable info Nick Piggin
2006-07-28  7:21 ` [patch 2/9] oom: reclaim_mapped on oom Nick Piggin
2006-07-28  7:21 ` [patch 3/9] cpuset: oom panic fix Nick Piggin
2006-07-28  7:29   ` Nick Piggin
2006-07-28  9:06   ` Paul Jackson
2006-07-28  7:21 ` [patch 4/9] oom: cpuset hint Nick Piggin
2006-07-28  9:07   ` Paul Jackson
2006-07-28  7:21 ` [patch 5/9] oom: handle current exiting Nick Piggin
2006-07-28  7:21 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2006-07-28  7:21 ` [patch 7/9] oom: swapoff tasks tweak Nick Piggin
2006-07-28  7:21 ` [patch 8/9] oom: kthread infinite loop fix Nick Piggin
2006-07-28  7:22 ` [patch 9/9] oom: more printk Nick Piggin
2006-07-28  7:44 ` [patch 0/9] oom: various fixes and improvements for 2.6.18-rc2 Andrew Morton
2006-07-28  9:28   ` Nick Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060515210622.30275.83981.sendpatchset@linux.site \
    --to=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox