From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Wienand Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 17:49:03 +1000 Subject: Re: [RFC 2/3] LVHPT - Setup LVHPT Message-ID: <20060503074903.GB4798@cse.unsw.EDU.AU> References: <4t153d$t4bok@azsmga001.ch.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4t153d$t4bok@azsmga001.ch.intel.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: "Chen, Kenneth W" Cc: "Luck, Tony" , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:30:07AM -0700, Chen, Kenneth W wrote: > Boot time option to the rescue! I have a patch that does just like that. Being relatively inexperienced, all this dynamic patching (SMP, page table, this) scares me in that what is executing diverges from what appears to be in source code, making difficult things even more difficult to debug. Is there consensus that a long term goal should be that short and long formats should be dynamically selectable? -i -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org