linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com, akpm@osdl.org, tony.luck@intel.com,
	ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH: 002/017]Memory hotplug for new nodes v.4.(change name old add_memory() to arch_add_memory())
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:38:39 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060322103839.3b3d2a66.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1142989698.10906.224.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 17:08:18 -0800
Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> If I missed it before, please refresh my memory.  But, if we're
> providing arch_nid_probe(addr), then why don't we just call it inside of
> add_memory() on the start address, instead of in the generic code?
> 
I think just *probe* needs it. The firmware which supports memory-hotplug, ACPI, 
i386/x86_64/ia64, can tell node number as pxm.(proximity domain)

add_memory() can pass address of paddr as args, but can't pass *pxm*. 

We already maintain pxm <-> nid map. But paddr <-> nid map isn't now.
If add_memory() doesn't has nid as args, we have to maintain
(1) pxm <-> nid map.
(2) paddr <-> nid map.
Becasue pfn_to_nid() is maintained by SPARSEMEM itself now, *new* paddr<->nid map
is redundant, I think. And I think the firmware already has the map before calling
add_memory(). 

> I'm also getting a bit confused in your patches whether add_memory() is
> the _original_ add_memory(), or the new one.  It tends to get lost in 17
> patches. :(
> 
maybe a big patch :(, We (I and Goto-san) are discussing to split them to
a bit small chunks. 

> I don't really like the arch_nid_probe() name.  We need to make it very
> apparent that it is to be used _only_ for memory hotplug operations.  It
> has no meaning for anything else.
> 
> 	hotplug_physaddr_to_nid()?
> 
> Maybe with a "memory_" in front.  Maybe even
> memory_add_physaddr_to_nid()?
> 
Okay, we'll rename it.

> It was probably to keep from changing as little code as possible, but
> please convert the u64 values to pfns as soon as possible.  I noticed
> that hotadd_new_pgdat() still deals with them, and does the shift as
> well.  Is that really necessary.
> 
> The u64s should not be kept for more than one level of calls.  That
> level of calls should be the firmware.  So, let the firmware call into
> the VM code with u64s, then have all of the plain VM code deal in pfns.
> 
Okay.

-- Kame

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2006-03-22  1:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-17  8:20 Yasunori Goto
2006-03-17 17:12 ` Dave Hansen
2006-03-18  1:26   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2006-03-21 18:00     ` Dave Hansen
2006-03-22  0:05       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2006-03-22  1:08         ` Dave Hansen
2006-03-22  1:38           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2006-03-22  6:06             ` Yasunori Goto

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060322103839.3b3d2a66.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox