From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 09:54:26 -0800 From: Paul Jackson Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] AutoPage Migration - V0.1 - 0/8 Overview Message-Id: <20060315095426.b70026b8.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <44183B64.3050701@argo.co.il> References: <1142019195.5204.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060311154113.c4358e40.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <1142270857.5210.50.camel@localhost.localdomain> <44183B64.3050701@argo.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Avi Kivity Cc: clameter@sgi.com, lee.schermerhorn@hp.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: > Doesn't it make sense to duplicate heavily accessed shared read-only pages? It might .. that would be a major and difficult effort, and it is not clear that it would be a win. The additional bookkeeping to figure out what pages were heavily accessed would be very costly. Probably prohibitive. That's certainly a very different discussion than migration. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org