Re: [ck] Re: [PATCH] mm: yield during swap prefetching

[Andreas Mohr <andi@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de>]

Hi,

On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 09:44:35AM +1100, Peter Williams wrote:
> I'm working on a patch to add soft and hard CPU rate caps to the 
> scheduler and the soft caps may be useful for what you're trying to do. 
>  They are a generalization of your SCHED_BATCH implementation in 
> staircase (which would have been better called SCHED_BACKGROUND :-) 
Which SCHED_BATCH? ;) I only know it as SCHED_IDLEPRIO, which, come to think
of it, is a better name, I believe :-)
(renamed due to mainline introducing a *different* SCHED_BATCH mechanism)

> IMHO) in that a task with a soft cap will only use more CPU than that 
> cap if it (the cpu) would otherwise go unused.  The main difference 
> between this mechanism and staircase's SCHED_BATCH mechanism is that you 
> can specify how much (as parts per thousand of a CPU) the task can use 
> instead of just being background or not background.  With the soft cap 
> set to zero the effect would be essentially the same.
Interesting. Hopefully it will bring some nice results!

Andreas

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>