From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Yasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: tony.luck@intel.com, ak@suse.de, jschopp@austin.ibm.com,
haveblue@us.ibm.com, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH: 004/017](RFC) Memory hotplug for new nodes v.3. (generic alloc pgdat)
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 04:00:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060309040045.17dbf286.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060308212719.002A.Y-GOTO@jp.fujitsu.com>
Yasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> For node hotplug, basically we have to allocate new pgdat.
> But, there are several types of implementations of pgdat.
>
> 1. Allocate only pgdat.
> This style allocate only pgdat area.
> And its address is recorded in node_data[].
> It is most popular style.
>
> 2. Static array of pgdat
> In this case, all of pgdats are static array.
> Some archs use this style.
>
> 3. Allocate not only pgdat, but also per node data.
> To increase performance, each node has copy of some data as
> a per node data. So, this area must be allocated too.
>
> Ia64 is this style. Ia64 has the copies of node_data[] array
> on each per node data to increase performance.
>
> In this series of patches, treat (1) as generic arch.
>
> generic archs can use generic function. (2) and (3) should have
> its own if necessary.
>
> This patch defines pgdat allocator.
> Updating NODE_DATA() macro function is in other patch.
>
> ( I'll post another patch for (3).
> I don't know (2) which can use memory hotplug.
> So, there is not patch for (2). )
>
> ...
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_NODEDATA_EXTENSION
> +/*
> + * For supporint node-hotadd, we have to allocate new pgdat.
> + *
> + * If an arch have generic style NODE_DATA(),
> + * node_data[nid] = kzalloc() works well . But it depends on each arch.
> + *
> + * In general, generic_alloc_nodedata() is used.
> + * generic...is a local function in mm/memory_hotplug.c
> + *
> + * Now, arch_free_nodedata() is just defined for error path of node_hot_add.
> + *
> + */
> +extern struct pglist_data * arch_alloc_nodedata(int nid);
> +extern void arch_free_nodedata(pg_data_t *pgdat);
> +
> +#else /* !CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_NODEDATA_EXTENSION */
> +#define arch_alloc_nodedata(nid) generic_alloc_nodedata(nid)
> +#define arch_free_nodedata(pgdat) generic_free_nodedata(pgdat)
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> +/*
> + * If ARCH_HAS_NODEDATA_EXTENSION=n, this func is used to allocate pgdat.
> + */
> +static inline struct pglist_data *generic_alloc_nodedata(int nid)
> +{
> + return kzalloc(sizeof(struct pglist_data), GFP_ATOMIC);
> +}
>From an interface design point of view it's usually best to pass the
gfp_flags ito a function which performs memory allocation, rather than
assuming the worst-case like this.
If it's known that callers of generic_alloc_nodedata() can just never ever
be permitted to sleep then OK. But GFP_KERNEL allocations are always
preferable.
> +/*
> + * This definition is just for error path in node hotadd.
> + * For node hotremove, we have to replace this.
> + */
> +static inline void generic_free_nodedata(struct pglist_data *pgdat)
> +{
> + kfree(pgdat);
> +}
> +
> +#else /* !CONFIG_NUMA */
> +/* never called */
> +static inline struct pglist_data *generic_alloc_nodedata(int nid)
> +{
> + BUG();
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +static inline void generic_free_nodedata(struct pglist_data *pgdat)
> +{
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
> +#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_NODEDATA_EXTENSION */
> +
Should the patch provide stubs for generic_alloc_nodedata() and
generic_alloc_nodedata() if !CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_NODEDATA_EXTENSION?
(If all callers are also inside #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_NODEDATA_EXTENSION
then the answer would be "no").
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-09 12:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-08 13:41 Yasunori Goto
2006-03-09 12:00 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-03-10 8:04 ` Yasunori Goto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060309040045.17dbf286.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jschopp@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox