From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: ck@vds.kolivas.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [ck] Re: [PATCH] mm: yield during swap prefetching
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 00:36:48 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200603090036.49915.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cone.1141774323.5234.18683.501@kolivas.org>
cc'ing Ingo...
On Wednesday 08 March 2006 10:32, Con Kolivas wrote:
> Andrew Morton writes:
> > Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> wrote:
> >> Swap prefetching doesn't use very much cpu but spends a lot of time
> >> waiting on disk in uninterruptible sleep. This means it won't get
> >> preempted often even at a low nice level since it is seen as sleeping
> >> most of the time. We want to minimise its cpu impact so yield where
> >> possible.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
> >> ---
> >> mm/swap_prefetch.c | 1 +
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>
> >> Index: linux-2.6.15-ck5/mm/swap_prefetch.c
> >> ===================================================================
> >> --- linux-2.6.15-ck5.orig/mm/swap_prefetch.c 2006-03-02
> >> 14:00:46.000000000 +1100 +++
> >> linux-2.6.15-ck5/mm/swap_prefetch.c 2006-03-08 08:49:32.000000000 +1100
> >> @@ -421,6 +421,7 @@ static enum trickle_return trickle_swap(
> >>
> >> if (trickle_swap_cache_async(swp_entry, node) == TRICKLE_DELAY)
> >> break;
> >> + yield();
> >> }
> >>
> >> if (sp_stat.prefetched_pages) {
> >
> > yield() really sucks if there are a lot of runnable tasks. And the
> > amount of CPU which that thread uses isn't likely to matter anyway.
> >
> > I think it'd be better to just not do this. Perhaps alter the thread's
> > static priority instead? Does the scheduler have a knob which can be
> > used to disable a tasks's dynamic priority boost heuristic?
>
> We do have SCHED_BATCH but even that doesn't really have the desired
> effect. I know how much yield sucks and I actually want it to suck as much
> as yield does.
Thinking some more on this I wonder if SCHED_BATCH isn't a strong enough
scheduling hint if it's not suitable for such an application. Ingo do you
think we could make SCHED_BATCH tasks always wake up on the expired array?
Cheers,
Con
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-08 13:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-07 23:13 Con Kolivas
2006-03-07 23:26 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-07 23:32 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-08 0:05 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-08 0:51 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-08 1:11 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-08 1:12 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-08 1:19 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-08 1:23 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-08 1:28 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-08 2:08 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-08 2:12 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-08 2:18 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-08 2:22 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-08 2:27 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-08 2:30 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-08 2:52 ` [ck] " André Goddard Rosa
2006-03-08 3:03 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-08 3:05 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-08 21:07 ` Zan Lynx
2006-03-08 23:00 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-08 23:48 ` Zan Lynx
2006-03-09 0:07 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-09 3:13 ` Zan Lynx
2006-03-09 4:08 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-09 4:54 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-08 7:51 ` Jan Knutar
2006-03-08 8:39 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-09 8:57 ` Helge Hafting
2006-03-09 9:08 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-09 22:44 ` Peter Williams
2006-03-10 9:01 ` [ck] " Andreas Mohr
2006-03-10 9:11 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-10 0:58 ` Peter Williams
2006-03-08 22:24 ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-09 2:22 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-09 2:30 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-09 2:57 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-09 9:11 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-08 13:36 ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2006-03-17 9:06 ` [ck] " Ingo Molnar
2006-03-08 8:48 ` Andreas Mohr
2006-03-08 8:52 ` Con Kolivas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200603090036.49915.kernel@kolivas.org \
--to=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox