From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 21:37:07 -0800 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: Get rid of scan_control Message-Id: <20060211213707.0ef39582.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060211211437.0633dfdb.akpm@osdl.org> References: <20060211045355.GA3318@dmt.cnet> <20060211013255.20832152.akpm@osdl.org> <20060211014649.7cb3b9e2.akpm@osdl.org> <43EEAC93.3000803@yahoo.com.au> <43EEB4DA.6030501@yahoo.com.au> <43EEC136.5060609@yahoo.com.au> <20060211211437.0633dfdb.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, clameter@engr.sgi.com, marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: Andrew Morton wrote: > > Returning nr_reclaimed up and down the stack makes sense too - I'll try that. wtf does this, in zone_reclaim() do? sc.nr_reclaimed = 1; /* Avoid getting the off node timeout */ -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org