From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 21:08:10 -0800 From: Paul Jackson Subject: Re: [patch 3/9] mempool - Make mempools NUMA aware Message-Id: <20060127210810.54177d6d.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <43DAC222.4060805@us.ibm.com> References: <20060125161321.647368000@localhost.localdomain> <1138233093.27293.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> <43D953C4.5020205@us.ibm.com> <43D95A2E.4020002@us.ibm.com> <43D96633.4080900@us.ibm.com> <43D96A93.9000600@us.ibm.com> <20060127025126.c95f8002.pj@sgi.com> <43DAC222.4060805@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Matthew Dobson Cc: clameter@engr.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sri@us.ibm.com, andrea@suse.de, pavel@suse.cz, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: Matthew wrote: > > I too am inclined to prefer the __GFP_CRITICAL approach over this. > > OK. Chalk one more up for that solution... I don't think my vote should count for much. See below. > This is supposed to be an implementation of Andrea's suggestion. There are > no hooks in ANY page_alloc.c code paths. These patches touch mempool code > and some slab code, but not any page allocator code. Yeah - you're right. I misread your patch set. Sorry for wasting your time. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org