From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 14:00:44 -0200 From: Marcelo Tosatti Subject: Re: Better pagecache statistics ? Message-ID: <20051201160044.GB14499@dmt.cnet> References: <1133377029.27824.90.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20051201152029.GA14499@dmt.cnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051201152029.GA14499@dmt.cnet> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Badari Pulavarty Cc: linux-mm , lkml List-ID: On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 01:20:29PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > Hi Badari, > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 10:57:09AM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Is there a effort/patches underway to provide better pagecache > > statistics ? > > > > Basically, I am interested in finding detailed break out of > > cached pages. ("Cached" in /proc/meminfo) > > > > Out of this "cached pages" > > > > - How much is just file system cache (regular file data) ? > > - How much is shared memory pages ? > > You could do that from userspace probably, by doing some math > on all processes statistics versus global stats, but does not > seem very practical. Actually, SysRQ-M reports "N pages shared". -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org