From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 11:22:37 +0100 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] Light Fragmentation Avoidance V20: 002_usemap Message-ID: <20051122102237.GK20775@brahms.suse.de> References: <20051115164946.21980.2026.sendpatchset@skynet.csn.ul.ie> <200511160036.54461.ak@suse.de> <200511160252.05494.ak@suse.de> <4382EF48.1050107@shadowen.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4382EF48.1050107@shadowen.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andy Whitcroft Cc: Mel Gorman , Andi Kleen , linux-mm@kvack.org, mingo@elte.hu, lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au List-ID: > All of that said, I am not even sure we have a bit left in the page > flags on smaller architectures :/. How about #define PG_checked 8 /* kill me in 2.5.. */ ? At least PG_uncached isn't used on many architectures too, so could be reused. I don't know why those that use it don't check VMAs instead. -Andi -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org