From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 06:45:31 -0800 From: Paul Jackson Subject: Re: [Lhms-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/5] Light Fragmentation Avoidance V20: 001_antidefrag_flags Message-Id: <20051120064531.7e7b4771.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20051115164946.21980.2026.sendpatchset@skynet.csn.ul.ie> <20051115164952.21980.3852.sendpatchset@skynet.csn.ul.ie> <20051115150054.606ce0df.pj@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Mel Gorman Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-ID: Mel wrote: > +#define __GFP_EASYRCLM ((__force gfp_t)0x80000u) > > Comment to right removed because the comment above the declaration covers > everything. (repeating myself) > How about fitting the style (casts, just one line) of the other flags, > so that these added six lines become instead just the one line: There is a consistent layout, one-per-line, to the other __GFP_* flags. The information content of the extra five lines you use for the __GFP_EASYRCLM flag does not warrant upsetting that layout, in my view. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org