From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/05] NUMA: Generic code Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:15:04 +0100 References: <20051110090920.8083.54147.sendpatchset@cherry.local> <200511110516.37980.ak@suse.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511151515.05201.ak@suse.de> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Magnus Damm Cc: Magnus Damm , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pj@sgi.com List-ID: On Tuesday 15 November 2005 09:34, Magnus Damm wrote: > > My plan with breaking out the NUMA emulation code was to merge my i386 > stuff with the x86_64 code, but as you say - it might be overkill. > > What do you think about the fact that real NUMA nodes now can be > divided into several smaller nodes? Is it really needed? I never needed it. Normally numa emulation is just for basic numa testing, and for that just an independent split is good enough. -Andi -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org