From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 20:20:20 -0800 From: William Lee Irwin III Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Hugetlb: Copy on Write support Message-ID: <20051110042020.GP29402@holomorphy.com> References: <1131578925.28383.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1131579596.28383.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1131587564.16514.53.camel@akash.sc.intel.com> <20051110035403.GM17840@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051110035403.GM17840@localhost.localdomain> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: David Gibson Cc: Rohit Seth , Adam Litke , akpm@osdl.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hugh@veritas.com, kenneth.w.chen@intel.com List-ID: On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 05:52:44PM -0800, Rohit Seth wrote: >> lazy_mmu_prot_update will need to called here to make caches coherent >> for some archs. On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 02:54:03PM +1100, David Gibson wrote: > Ah, yes indeed. Revised version below. While I was at it, I moved > set_huge_ptep_writable() into mm/hugetlb.c, since there's no actual > need for it to be in the .h, and abolished huge_ptep_set_wrprotect() > since there's no need for the macro at all. > Hugetlb: Copy on Write support Re-acking. Good catch, thanks Rohit. Acked-by: William Irwin -- wli -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org