From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 16:11:34 +1100 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19 Message-Id: <20051102161134.25f3b85d.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20051030235440.6938a0e9.akpm@osdl.org> <27700000.1130769270@[10.10.2.4]> <4366A8D1.7020507@yahoo.com.au> <4366C559.5090504@yahoo.com.au> <4366D469.2010202@yahoo.com.au> <20051101135651.GA8502@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Mel Gorman Cc: mingo@elte.hu, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, mbligh@mbligh.org, kravetz@us.ibm.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-ID: Mel Gorman wrote: > > As GFP_ATOMIC and GFP_NOFS cannot do > any reclaim work themselves Both GFP_NOFS and GFP_NOIO can indeed perform direct reclaim. All we require is __GFP_WAIT. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org