From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 20:09:16 -0700 From: Paul Jackson Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Clean up of __alloc_pages Message-Id: <20051029200916.61a32331.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <43643195.9040600@yahoo.com.au> References: <20051028183326.A28611@unix-os.sc.intel.com> <20051029184728.100e3058.pj@sgi.com> <4364296E.1080905@yahoo.com.au> <20051029192611.79b9c5e7.pj@sgi.com> <43643195.9040600@yahoo.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Nick Piggin Cc: rohit.seth@intel.com, akpm@osdl.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Nick wrote: > See how can_try_harder and gfp_high is used currently. Ah - by "current" you meant in Linus's or Andrew's tree, not as in Seth's current patch. Since they are booleans, rather than tri-values, using an enum is overkill. Ok. Now I'm one less clue short of understanding. Thanks. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org