From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 20:09:33 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: VM_XIP Request for comments Message-ID: <20051027190933.GC16211@infradead.org> References: <6934efce0510251542j66c0a738qe3c37fe56aaaaf2d@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6934efce0510251542j66c0a738qe3c37fe56aaaaf2d@mail.gmail.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Jared Hulbert Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 03:42:25PM -0700, Jared Hulbert wrote: > What would it take to get this first patch in the kernel? > > The reason for the first patch is in the second patch, which I will > try to get into the kernel list. With this mmap()'ed files can be > used directly from flash when possible and COW's it when necessary.. Can't you use the XIP infrastructure we already have? Grep for CONFIG_XIP and CONFIG_EXT2_FS_XIP -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org