From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 08:18:34 -0700 From: Paul Jackson Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Swap migration V3: sys_migrate_pages interface Message-Id: <20051021081834.056a44af.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <435896CA.1000101@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <20051020225935.19761.57434.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> <20051020225955.19761.53060.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> <4358588D.1080307@jp.fujitsu.com> <435896CA.1000101@jp.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: Simon.Derr@bull.net, clameter@sgi.com, akpm@osdl.org, kravetz@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, magnus.damm@gmail.com, marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com List-ID: Kame wrote: > *new* is already guaranteed to be the subset of current mem_allowed. > Is this violate the permission ? The question is not so much whether the current tasks mems_allowed is violated, but whether the mems_allowed of the cpuset of the task that owns the pages is violated. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org