From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 10:53:46 -0700 From: Paul Jackson Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Fragmentation Avoidance V17 Message-Id: <20051016105346.01c79929.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20051011151221.16178.67130.sendpatchset@skynet.csn.ul.ie> <20051015195213.44e0dabb.pj@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Mel Gorman Cc: akpm@osdl.org, jschopp@austin.ibm.com, kravetz@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-ID: Mel wrote: > I would be happy with __GFP_USERRCLM but __GFP_EASYRCLM may be more > obvious? I would be delighted with either one. Yes, __GFP_EASYRCLM is more obvious. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org