From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, jschopp@austin.ibm.com, kravetz@us.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Fragmentation Avoidance V17
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 19:52:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051015195213.44e0dabb.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051011151221.16178.67130.sendpatchset@skynet.csn.ul.ie>
Mel wrote:
> +#define __GFP_USER 0x80000u /* User and other easily reclaimed pages */
> +#define __GFP_KERNRCLM 0x100000u /* Kernel page that is reclaimable */
Sorry, but that __GFP_USER name is still sticking in my craw.
I won't try to reopen my quest to get it named __GFP_REALLY_REALLY_EASY_RCLM
or whatever it was, but instead will venture on a new quest.
Can we get the 'RCLM' in there. Especially since this term appears
naked in such code as:
> - page = alloc_page(GFP_HIGHUSER);
> + page = alloc_page(GFP_HIGHUSER|__GFP_USER);
where it is not at all obvious to the reader of this file (fs/exec.c)
that the __GFP_USER term is commenting on the reclaim behaviour of
the page to be allocated.
I'd be happier with:
> +#define __GFP_USERRCLM 0x80000u /* User and other easily reclaimed pages */
> +#define __GFP_KERNRCLM 0x100000u /* Kernel page that is reclaimable */
and:
> - page = alloc_page(GFP_HIGHUSER);
> + page = alloc_page(GFP_HIGHUSER|__GFP_USERRCLM);
Also the bold assymetry of these two #defines seems to be without motivation,
one with the 'RCLM', and the other with ' ' four spaces.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-16 2:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-11 15:12 Mel Gorman
2005-10-11 15:12 ` [PATCH 1/8] Fragmentation Avoidance V17: 001_antidefrag_flags Mel Gorman
2005-10-11 15:12 ` [PATCH 2/8] Fragmentation Avoidance V17: 002_usemap Mel Gorman
2005-10-13 13:56 ` Dave Hansen
2005-10-13 14:10 ` Mel Gorman
2005-10-13 14:18 ` Dave Hansen
2005-10-13 14:35 ` Mel Gorman
2005-10-16 20:44 ` Mel Gorman
2005-10-13 16:33 ` Joel Schopp
2005-10-11 15:12 ` [PATCH 3/8] Fragmentation Avoidance V17: 003_fragcore Mel Gorman
2005-10-11 15:12 ` [PATCH 4/8] Fragmentation Avoidance V17: 004_markfree Mel Gorman
2005-10-11 15:12 ` [PATCH 5/8] Fragmentation Avoidance V17: 005_fallback Mel Gorman
2005-10-12 16:43 ` mike kravetz
2005-10-12 17:21 ` Mel Gorman
2005-10-12 17:29 ` [Lhms-devel] " Joel Schopp
2005-10-14 5:12 ` Dave Hansen
2005-10-11 15:12 ` [PATCH 6/8] Fragmentation Avoidance V17: 006_largealloc_tryharder Mel Gorman
2005-10-13 19:07 ` Joel Schopp
2005-10-14 5:36 ` Dave Hansen
2005-10-11 15:12 ` [PATCH 7/8] Fragmentation Avoidance V17: 007_percpu Mel Gorman
2005-10-11 15:13 ` [PATCH 8/8] Fragmentation Avoidance V17: 008_stats Mel Gorman
2005-10-12 11:57 ` [Lhms-devel] " Dave Hansen
2005-10-12 12:19 ` Mel Gorman
2005-10-16 2:52 ` Paul Jackson [this message]
2005-10-16 11:59 ` [PATCH 0/8] Fragmentation Avoidance V17 Mel Gorman
2005-10-16 17:53 ` Paul Jackson
2005-10-16 18:03 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051015195213.44e0dabb.pj@sgi.com \
--to=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jschopp@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=kravetz@us.ibm.com \
--cc=lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox