From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: Benchmarks to exploit LRU deficiencies Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 02:41:41 +0200 References: <20051010184636.GA15415@logos.cnet> <200510110213.29937.ak@suse.de> <20051010202614.GB15631@logos.cnet> In-Reply-To: <20051010202614.GB15631@logos.cnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200510110241.42225.ak@suse.de> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Marcelo Tosatti Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, sjiang@lanl.gov, rni@andrew.cmu.edu, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, riel@redhat.com List-ID: On Monday 10 October 2005 22:26, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > But other than that it works fine AFAIK. I don't think so. > > > We seem to have far more problems in this area than with the > > standard page cache. > > How's that? At least in many cases where i've seen machines becomming unusable the problem was dcache/inode pollution, not page cache getting unbalanced. Good example is running rsync. -Andi -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org