From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
Cc: haveblue@us.ibm.com, magnus@valinux.co.jp, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/07][RFC] i386: NUMA emulation
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2005 22:33:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051002223352.6d21a8bc.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aec7e5c30510022205o770b6335o96d9a9d9cc5d7397@mail.gmail.com>
Magnus wrote:
> So, Paul, please let me know if you prefer SMP || NUMA or no
> depencencies in the Kconfig.
In theory, I prefer none. But the devil is in the details here,
and I really don't care that much.
So pick whichever you prefer, or whichever provides the nicest
looking code or patch, or flip a coin ;).
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-03 5:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-30 7:33 Magnus Damm
2005-09-30 7:33 ` [PATCH 01/07] i386: srat non acpi Magnus Damm, Magnus Damm
2005-09-30 7:33 ` [PATCH 02/07] i386: numa on non-smp Magnus Damm, Magnus Damm
2005-09-30 7:33 ` [PATCH 03/07] cpuset: smp or numa Magnus Damm, Magnus Damm
2005-09-30 7:33 ` [PATCH 04/07] i386: numa warning fix Magnus Damm, Isaku Yamahata
2005-09-30 7:33 ` [PATCH 05/07] i386: sparsemem on pc Magnus Damm, Magnus Damm
2005-09-30 15:25 ` Dave Hansen
2005-10-01 0:32 ` Magnus Damm
2005-09-30 7:33 ` [PATCH 06/07] i386: discontigmem " Magnus Damm, Magnus Damm
2005-09-30 7:33 ` [PATCH 07/07] i386: numa emulation " Magnus Damm, Isaku Yamahata
2005-09-30 18:55 ` Dave Hansen
2005-10-03 9:59 ` Magnus Damm
2005-10-03 16:16 ` Dave Hansen
2005-10-04 5:06 ` Magnus Damm
2005-10-04 7:52 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2005-10-04 9:49 ` Magnus Damm
2005-09-30 15:23 ` [PATCH 00/07][RFC] i386: NUMA emulation Dave Hansen
2005-10-03 2:08 ` Magnus Damm
2005-10-03 7:34 ` David Lang
2005-10-03 10:02 ` Magnus Damm
2005-10-03 13:33 ` David Lang
2005-10-03 14:59 ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-10-03 15:03 ` David Lang
2005-10-03 15:08 ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-10-03 15:13 ` David Lang
2005-10-03 15:25 ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-10-03 15:32 ` David Lang
2005-10-03 15:54 ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-10-03 16:44 ` David Lang
2005-10-03 14:45 ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-10-03 14:49 ` David Lang
2005-10-03 3:21 ` Paul Jackson
2005-10-03 5:05 ` Magnus Damm
2005-10-03 5:26 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2005-10-03 5:33 ` Paul Jackson [this message]
2005-10-03 5:59 ` Magnus Damm
2005-10-03 7:26 ` Paul Jackson
2005-10-03 5:34 ` Paul Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051002223352.6d21a8bc.pj@sgi.com \
--to=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=magnus@valinux.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox