linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Hicks <mort@sgi.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@mbligh.org>,
	rohit.seth@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Martin Hicks <mort@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] earlier allocation of order 0 pages from pcp in __alloc_pages
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 08:30:32 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050930123031.GZ32494@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050929161118.27f9f1eb.akpm@osdl.org>

On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 04:11:18PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@mbligh.org> wrote:
> >
> > It looks like we're now dropping into direct reclaim as the first thing
> > in __alloc_pages before even trying to kick off kswapd. When the hell
> > did that start? Or is that only meant to trigger if we're already below
> > the low watermark level?
> 
> That's all the numa goop which Martin Hicks added.  It's all disabled if
> z->reclaim_pages is zero (it is).  However we could be testing that flag a
> bit earlier, I think.
> 
> And yeah, some de-spaghettification would be nice.  Certainly before adding
> more logic.
> 
> Martin, should we take out the early zone reclaim logic?  It's all
> unreachable at present anyway.
> 

Yes, Please do.

mh


-- 
Martin Hicks   ||   Silicon Graphics Inc.   ||   mort@sgi.com

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-09-30 12:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-29 22:01 Seth, Rohit
2005-09-29 22:36 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-30  1:05   ` Rohit Seth
2005-09-29 22:48 ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-09-29 23:11   ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-30  1:58     ` Rohit Seth
2005-09-30 12:30     ` Martin Hicks [this message]
2005-09-30  1:32   ` Rohit Seth
2005-09-30  1:32     ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-09-29 22:50 ` Dave Hansen
2005-09-30  1:10   ` Rohit Seth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050930123031.GZ32494@localhost \
    --to=mort@sgi.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mbligh@mbligh.org \
    --cc=rohit.seth@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox