* Re: 2.6.14-rc2 early boot OOPS (mm/slab.c:1767) [not found] <20050927202858.GG1046@vega.lnet.lut.fi> @ 2005-09-27 23:35 ` Christoph Lameter 2005-09-28 6:30 ` Tomi Lapinlampi 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Christoph Lameter @ 2005-09-27 23:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tomi Lapinlampi; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, alokk On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Tomi Lapinlampi wrote: > I'm getting the following OOPS with 2.6.14-rc2 on an Alpha. Hmmm. I am not familiar with Alpha. The .config looks as if this is a uniprocessor configuration? No NUMA? What is the value of MAX_NUMNODES? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.14-rc2 early boot OOPS (mm/slab.c:1767) 2005-09-27 23:35 ` 2.6.14-rc2 early boot OOPS (mm/slab.c:1767) Christoph Lameter @ 2005-09-28 6:30 ` Tomi Lapinlampi 2005-09-28 6:47 ` Andrew Morton 2005-09-28 17:08 ` Christoph Lameter 0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Tomi Lapinlampi @ 2005-09-28 6:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christoph Lameter; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, alokk On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 04:35:54PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Tomi Lapinlampi wrote: > > > I'm getting the following OOPS with 2.6.14-rc2 on an Alpha. > > Hmmm. I am not familiar with Alpha. The .config looks as if this is a > uniprocessor configuration? No NUMA? This is a simple uniprocessor configuration, no NUMA, no SMP. > What is the value of MAX_NUMNODES? I'm not familiar with NUMA, where can I check this (or does this question even apply since it's not a NUMA system) ? Plase keep me cc:'d, Tomi -- You can decide: live with free software or with only one evil company left? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.14-rc2 early boot OOPS (mm/slab.c:1767) 2005-09-28 6:30 ` Tomi Lapinlampi @ 2005-09-28 6:47 ` Andrew Morton 2005-09-28 17:08 ` Christoph Lameter 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Andrew Morton @ 2005-09-28 6:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tomi Lapinlampi; +Cc: clameter, linux-kernel, linux-mm, alokk lapinlam@vega.lnet.lut.fi (Tomi Lapinlampi) wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 04:35:54PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Tomi Lapinlampi wrote: > > > > > I'm getting the following OOPS with 2.6.14-rc2 on an Alpha. > > > > Hmmm. I am not familiar with Alpha. The .config looks as if this is a > > uniprocessor configuration? No NUMA? > > This is a simple uniprocessor configuration, no NUMA, no SMP. It might be due to the indev_of()-doesn't-get-inlined problem. I'm not sure what the symptoms of that were. Please try ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/patch-2.6.14-rc2-git6.gz which has fixes. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.14-rc2 early boot OOPS (mm/slab.c:1767) 2005-09-28 6:30 ` Tomi Lapinlampi 2005-09-28 6:47 ` Andrew Morton @ 2005-09-28 17:08 ` Christoph Lameter 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Christoph Lameter @ 2005-09-28 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tomi Lapinlampi; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, alokk On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Tomi Lapinlampi wrote: > > Hmmm. I am not familiar with Alpha. The .config looks as if this is a > > uniprocessor configuration? No NUMA? > > This is a simple uniprocessor configuration, no NUMA, no SMP. > > > What is the value of MAX_NUMNODES? > > I'm not familiar with NUMA, where can I check this (or does this question > even apply since it's not a NUMA system) ? Well, one use of memory nodes is to describe discontiguous memory on some architectures. Thus the number of nodes may be more than one even if CONFIG_NUMA is off. This is the case f.e. on ppc64. There may be some arch specific settings that cause problems here. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-09-28 17:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20050927202858.GG1046@vega.lnet.lut.fi>
2005-09-27 23:35 ` 2.6.14-rc2 early boot OOPS (mm/slab.c:1767) Christoph Lameter
2005-09-28 6:30 ` Tomi Lapinlampi
2005-09-28 6:47 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-28 17:08 ` Christoph Lameter
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox