From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 14:57:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20050902.145747.66384453.davem@davemloft.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.13] lockless pagecache 2/7 From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <4318C884.3050607@yahoo.com.au> References: <4318C28A.5010000@yahoo.com.au> <20050902.143149.08652495.davem@davemloft.net> <4318C884.3050607@yahoo.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org From: Nick Piggin Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2005 07:47:48 +1000 Return-Path: To: nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au Cc: ak@suse.de, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > So neither could currently supported atomic_t ops be shared with > userland accesses? Correct. > Then I think it would not be breaking any interface rule to do an > atomic_t atomic_cmpxchg either. Definitely for my usage it will > not be shared with userland. Ok. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org