From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Phillips Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Rename PageChecked as PageMiscFS Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 02:31:18 +1000 References: <20050818222721.GC4275@elf.ucw.cz> <7489.1124375598@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <8880.1124445882@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <8880.1124445882@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508200231.19341.phillips@istop.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: David Howells Cc: Pavel Machek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Hugh Dickins List-ID: On Friday 19 August 2005 20:04, David Howells wrote: > Pavel Machek wrote: > > > I disagree again. I don't think PageFsMisc() is particularly ugly or > > > unreadable; and it makes it a touch more likely that someone reading > > > code that uses it will notice that it's a miscellaneous flag > > > specifically for filesystem use (you can't rely on them going and > > > looking in the header file for a comment). > > > > Well, is it PageFsMisc or PageFSMisc? Subject gets second variant, and > > I like it better, too. (That does not mean I like it). > > The Subject wasn't set by me. Somehow the PageFsMisc variant looks better > to me, but I could just be biased. Biased. Fs is a mixed case acronym, nuff said. Regards, Daniel -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org