From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 06:34:35 +0200 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [RFC] Concept for delayed counter updates in mm_struct Message-ID: <20050819043435.GD3953@verdi.suse.de> References: <20050817151723.48c948c7.akpm@osdl.org> <20050817174359.0efc7a6a.akpm@osdl.org> <20050818212939.7dca44c3.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050818212939.7dca44c3.akpm@osdl.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrew Morton Cc: Christoph Lameter , hugh@veritas.com, torvalds@osdl.org, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: > Is ptrace->get_user_pages() the only place where one process pokes > at another process's memory? I think so.. /proc/*/{cmdline,env}. But they all use get_user_pages() -Andi -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org